The Impact of Google Scholar De-Indexing on Academic Visibility and Citation Performance: A Systematic Review

Authors

  • Delap Tonfold Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61424/hr75ba93

Keywords:

Google Scholar, de-indexing, academic visibility, citation performance, scholarly communication, research impact, indexing

Abstract

Google Scholar has become a major platform for discovering scholarly literature, monitoring research impact, and supporting academic visibility through citation tracking. However, the de-indexing of scholarly publications from Google Scholar may reduce the discoverability of research outputs and potentially affect citation performance. This systematic review examines the impact of Google Scholar de-indexing on academic visibility and citation performance, with particular attention to the patterns, causes, and consequences of removal or loss of indexed scholarly records. The review synthesizes evidence from relevant studies and scholarly literature concerning Google Scholar indexing, academic discoverability, citation accumulation, metadata quality, technical accessibility, publisher practices, and research evaluation. The findings indicate that de-indexing can reduce the online discoverability of affected publications, interrupt citation tracking, create inconsistencies in author and institutional profiles, and limit the extent to which scholarly outputs contribute to visible citation-based indicators. The review further identifies technical problems, incomplete or inconsistent metadata, inaccessible full-text files, duplicate or malformed records, changes in publication platforms, and editorial or publishing-related issues as important factors that may contribute to indexing instability. However, the effects of de-indexing are not uniform, as citation performance is also influenced by publication quality, disciplinary practices, article age, collaboration networks, journal visibility, and availability through alternative scholarly databases and repositories. The study concludes that maintaining accurate metadata, technically accessible publications, stable web infrastructure, and consistent editorial practices is essential for sustaining Google Scholar visibility and reliable citation tracking. The review contributes to a better understanding of de-indexing as an important scholarly communication and research-impact issue and highlights the need for publishers, editors, researchers, and institutions to adopt proactive strategies for monitoring and maintaining academic discoverability.

References

Amaya Camposeco, J. E. (2017). The right to be forgotten: a descriptive overview of the right to be forgotten.

Aniwa S.C. (2021). Impact of Supply Chain Integration on Operational Performance: Insights from Manufacturing Firms in Emerging Economies. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(4).

Batool, A., Naseem, M., & Toyama, K. (2024, May). Expanding concepts of non-consensual image-disclosure abuse: A study of NCIDA in Pakistan. In Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-17).

Belategi, M. A. (2024). The right to be forgotten concerning the criminal past: Developments in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights with particular reference to the anonymisation of digital press archives. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 14(6), 1639-1669.

Bloch-Wehba, H. (2019). Global platform governance: private power in the shadow of the state. SMu l. reV., 72, 27.

Brock, G. (2016). The right to be forgotten: privacy and the media in the digital age. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Cofone, I. (Ed.). (2020). The right to be forgotten: A Canadian and comparative perspective. Routledge.

Cortegiani, A., Ippolito, M., Ingoglia, G., Manca, A., Cugusi, L., Severin, A., ... & Giarratano, A. (2020). Citations and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns: the GhoS (t) copus Project. F1000Research, 9, 415.

Cuomo, M. T., & Foroudi, P. (Eds.). (2023). Digital transformation and corporate branding: Opportunities and pitfalls for identity and reputation management. Taylor & Francis.

Diab, R. (2018). Search Engines and Global Takedown Orders: Google v Equustek and the Future of Free Speech Online. Osgoode Hall LJ, 56, 231.

Gordon, J. C. (2019). The perils of vanguardism: Explaining radical cuts to unemployment insurance in Sweden. Socio-Economic Review, 17(4), 947-968.

Graham, C. (2014). The calculation of age. Organization Studies, 35(11), 1627-1653.

Islam, A., & Jantan, A. H. B. (2023). The mediation effect of affective organizational commitment on the relationship between HRM practices and turnover intention in the RMG industry. Research Journal in Business and Economics, 1(1), 24-38.

Islam, A., Jantan, A. H. B., Khalifa, G. S., Islam, A., Islam, B., & Hossian, A. (2023). Effects of Decision Making and Work-life Balance on Productivity of Female Employees in the RMG Industry of Bangladesh. The Mediating Role of Work Motivation. Research Journal in Business and Economics, 1(1), 48-59.

Islam, M. A., & Sinniah, S. (2025). Exploring customer relationship management factors, customer trust, and innovation capacity: A quantitative study on customer retention. Accountancy Business and the Public Interest, 41(10), 12-29.

Islam, M. A., Islam, M. A., Amin, M. B., Hossain, M. M., Hassan, M. S., Afrin, S., & Oláh, J. (2025). Enhancing academic's performance: Exploring the interaction of innovative work behavior, intrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy in public universities. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 102210.

Jørgensen, R. F. (2019). Rights talk: in the kingdom of online giants. Human rights in the age of platforms, 163.

Kurek, M. R., Poulin, B. A., McKenna, A. M., & Spencer, R. G. (2020). Deciphering dissolved organic matter: Ionization, dopant, and fragmentation insights via Fourier transform-ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. Environmental Science & Technology, 54(24), 16249-16259.

Marsh, A., & Lerner, A. (2024). Privacy norms of transformative fandom: A case study of an activity-defined community. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8(CSCW1), 1-29.

Mira, B. S. D., Oliveira, C. G. D., & Shintaku, M. (2022). [RETRACTED ARTICLE] Editorial path and the visibility of scientific publications: an exploratory case study on the journal Tchê Química. RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, 20, e022011.

Pandita, R., & Singh, S. (2022). Journal packing density of library and information science research journals at the global level: a study. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 71(8-9), 857-872.

Pasquale, F. (2020). Internet nondiscrimination principles revisited. Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper, (655).

Polataiko, M. (2017). Best We Forget: Expressive Freedom and the Right to be Forgotten. In 7th USENIX Workshop on Free and Open Communications on the Internet (FOCI 17).

Romele, A. (2016). Digital Traceability and the right to be forgotten. Ricoeurian perspectives. Tropos. Journal of Hermeneutics and Philosophical Criticism, 2(8).

Savegnago de Mira, B., Gomes de Oliveira, C., & Shintaku, M. (2022). Editorial path and the visibility of scientific publications: an exploratory case study on the journal Tchê Química. RDBCI: Digital Journal of Library & Information Science/Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, 20, 1.

Schwemer, S. F., Mahler, T., & Styri, H. (2021). Liability exemptions of non-hosting intermediaries: Sideshow in the Digital Services Act?. Oslo Law Review, 8(1), 4-29.

Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Nazarovets, S. (2023). Can the principle of the ‘right to be forgotten’be applied to academic publishing? Probe from the perspective of personal rights, archival science, open science and post‐publication peer review. Learned Publishing, 36(4), 651-666.

Van Hoboken, J. (2012). Search engine freedom: on the implications of the right to freedom of expression for the legal governance of Web search engines (Vol. 432). Alphen aan de Rijn: Kluwer Law International.

Voss, W. G., & Castets-Renard, C. (2015). Proposal for an international taxonomy on the various forms of the right to be forgotten: A Study on the Convergence of Norms. Colo. Tech. LJ, 14, 281.

Yoon, Y. J. (2014). Legal Ramifications of" Black Hat" Search Engine Optimization. BUJ Sci. & Tech. L., 20, 159.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-26